<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Great Gift Idea: The Modern Piggy Bank	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.onefrugalgirl.com/great-gift-idea-the-modern-piggy-bank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.onefrugalgirl.com/great-gift-idea-the-modern-piggy-bank/</link>
	<description>Earn, Save, and Live Joyfully.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: enoughwealth@yahoo.com		</title>
		<link>https://www.onefrugalgirl.com/great-gift-idea-the-modern-piggy-bank/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[enoughwealth@yahoo.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onefrugalgirl.com/?p=75#comment-55</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aside from the social re-engineering factor of having a very large &quot;donate&quot; section (isn&#039;t that what taxes are for?), and only the smallest section being &quot;save&quot;, I have a problem with these type of &quot;four-compartment&quot; piggy banks - why have ANY section specifically for &quot;spend&quot;? It&#039;s not as if the saved money is not going to be spent eventually (and what&#039;s the difference between saving and investing anyhow?), it&#039;s only deferred consumption after all. Having a specific section for &quot;spend&quot; sends out the wrong signal - that you should expect to spend some fixed part of your income each week. Why not just SAVE everything in a piggy bank like the old days, and spend as little as possible?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regards&lt;br/&gt;http://enoughwealth.blogspot.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the social re-engineering factor of having a very large &#8220;donate&#8221; section (isn&#8217;t that what taxes are for?), and only the smallest section being &#8220;save&#8221;, I have a problem with these type of &#8220;four-compartment&#8221; piggy banks &#8211; why have ANY section specifically for &#8220;spend&#8221;? It&#8217;s not as if the saved money is not going to be spent eventually (and what&#8217;s the difference between saving and investing anyhow?), it&#8217;s only deferred consumption after all. Having a specific section for &#8220;spend&#8221; sends out the wrong signal &#8211; that you should expect to spend some fixed part of your income each week. Why not just SAVE everything in a piggy bank like the old days, and spend as little as possible?</p>
<p>Regards<br /><a href="http://enoughwealth.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://enoughwealth.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
